by Jerry Cornfield, Washington State Standard
August 27, 2026
Arthur West is a prolific filer of legal complaints in pursuit of greater government transparency and a fairer political system in Washington.
Typically, he represents himself and targets the structures of power and their occupants.
But Tuesday, the open government activist turned his attention to Jim Walsh, suing the state lawmaker and chair of the Washington State Republican Party for defaming him in social media posts after West’s recent setback in Thurston County Superior Court.
On Aug. 7, Superior Court Judge Chris Lanese denied West’s request to amend or remove a statement set to appear on ballots describing the budgetary consequences of an initiative to repeal Washington’s new income tax on high earners.
Lanese’s ruling led to the cancellation of a separate legal challenge over the wording backed by the Republican Party that was scheduled for later that day.
In the wake of the decision, Walsh took to Facebook, where he lambasted Lanese and insisted West was “tricked” into making “procedural errors” that killed the other case against the public investment impact disclosure for Initiative 645, according to West’s complaint.
Those assertions were repeated in a similarly toned post on the state Republican Party’s Facebook page under the headline of “Call to Action” that urged “concerned voters” to file a complaint against Lanese.
West, in his lawsuit, said that second post “repeated and amplified” false claims made by Walsh and added a new “false factual assertion — that Judge Lanese ‘set a trap’ for West that ‘tricked’ West into stating he was also representing Let’s Go Washington’s case — which he was not.’”
Let’s Go Washington is the sponsor of the income tax initiative and it was the political committee’s challenge of the disclosure statement content that was canceled.
“These statements are false statements of fact, not opinion or rhetorical hyperbole. West did not in any way state, represent, or imply to the court that he represented Let’s Go Washington’s case, and was not ‘tricked’ into doing so,” West wrote in his complaint.
West, on Aug. 21, sent Walsh an email demanding a “correction, clarification, or a clear ringing retraction and apology.” None came.
But the posts disappeared, West said.
Walsh, in a text exchange, said the “call to action” was about Lanese and “had nothing to do with Arthur West.” It came down because it was “time sensitive,” he said.
“West was not defamed by me over his unsuccessful arguments in Lanese’s court during the hearing,” Walsh said Tuesday.
While there is no longer a post on his personal Facebook page, Walsh’s X account has an Aug. 8 post decrying Lanese as a “terrible judge” who “set a trap for a gullible nonlawyer.”
West, in his lawsuit, is seeking punitive damages and an “unambiguous retraction and correction of the defamatory statements” from Walsh and the party.
The lawsuit, known as West v. Walsh, was assigned to Lanese.
Washington State Standard is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Washington State Standard maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Bill Lucia for questions: [email protected].