MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) — Additional in vitro fertilization providers in Alabama paused parts of their treatment Thursday, sending patients scrambling to make other plans after the state Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos are legally considered children.
The decisions by Alabama Fertility Services and Mobile Infirmary come a day after the University of Alabama at Birmingham health system said in a statement that it was pausing IVF treatments so it could evaluate whether its patients or doctors could face criminal charges or punitive damages.
Alabama Fertility Services said in a statement that it “made the impossibly difficult decision to hold new IVF treatments due to the legal risk to our clinic and our embryologists” and was working to find solutions for patients.
Mobile Infirmary, a hospital in the Infirmary Health system, decided the ruling left the provider with no choice but to pause treatments, system President and CEO Mark Nix said in a statement.
“We understand the burden this places on deserving families who want to bring babies into this world and who have no alternative options for conceiving,” Nix said.
Doctors and patients have been grappling with shock and fear this week as they try to determine what they can and can’t do after the ruling by the all-Republican Alabama Supreme Court that raises questions about the future of IVF.
Alabama Fertility Services’ decision left Gabby Goidel, who was days from an expected egg retrieval, calling clinics across the South looking for a place to continue IVF care.
“I freaked out. I started crying. I felt in an extreme limbo state. They did not have all the answers. I did not obviously have any answers,” Goidel said.
The Alabama ruling came down Friday, the same day Goidel began a 10-day series of injections ahead of egg retrieval, with the hopes of getting pregnant through IVF next month. Goidel, who experienced three miscarriages and turned to IVF as a way she and her husband could fulfill their dream of becoming parents, found a place in Texas that will continue her care and plans to travel there Thursday night.
“It’s not pro-family in any way,” Goidel said of the Alabama ruling.
Dr. Michael C. Allemand, a reproductive endocrinologist at Alabama Fertility, said Wednesday that IVF is often the best treatment for patients who desperately want a child, and the ruling threatens doctors’ ability to provide that care.
“The moments that our patients are wanting to have by growing their families — Christmas mornings with grandparents, kindergarten, going in the first day of school, with little backpacks— all that stuff is what this is about. Those are the real moments that this ruling could deprive patients of,” he said.
At the Fertility Institute of North Alabama, Dr. Brett Davenport said his clinic will continue providing IVF as always.
“What we do could not be any more pro-life. We’re trying to help couples who can’t otherwise conceive a child,” Davenport said.
He added that a fraction of fertilized eggs result in pregnancy when a couple is trying to conceive naturally. What fertility doctors do with IVF is in many ways “mimicking the natural process that happens in a female body,” he said.
In their ruling last week, justices — citing language in the Alabama Constitution that the state recognizes the “rights of the unborn child” — said three couples could sue for wrongful death when their frozen embryos were destroyed in an accident at a storage facility.
“Unborn children are ‘children’ … without exception based on developmental stage, physical location, or any other ancillary characteristics,” Justice Jay Mitchell wrote in the majority ruling. Mitchell said the court had previously ruled that a fetus killed when a woman is pregnant is covered under Alabama’s Wrongful Death of a Minor Act and nothing excludes “extrauterine children from the Act’s coverage.”
Republican state Sen. Tim Melson, who is a doctor, said he’s not surprised by the unintended consequences of the ruling and intends to file legislation to protect IVF services in the state. Melson said the legislation seeks to clarify that a fertilized egg has legal protections once it is implanted in the uterus but until then is a “potential life.”
“I’m just trying to come up with a solution for the IVF industry and protect the doctors and still make it available for people who have fertility issues that need to be addressed because they want to have a family,” Melson said.
Although the Alabama court case centered on whether embryos were covered under the wrongful death of a minor statute, some said treating the embryo as a child could have broader implications.
Rachel Rebouche, dean of Temple University Beasley School of Law in Philadelphia, sees the ruling as “emblematic of the long march toward fetal personhood.”
“This may not be the case that launches it, but this is a very strategic decision on the part of anti-abortion forces because they know that personhood bills have failed,” Rebouche said.
Dr. John Storment, a reproductive endocrinologist in Lafayette, Louisiana, said the Alabama decision could affect whether fertility doctors want to move to or stay in that state.
“I don’t think that any doctor knowing that there’s a potential for criminal prosecution would even want to be in that position,” he said. “There’s 49 other states and many other countries they could practice in without the same threat.”
___